TOC Next Previous

An Exacting Standard:


Other public agencies have safety-related
responsibilities to the community. For example, fire departments are expected
to investigate reports of fires and provide necessary remedial services.
Generally, fire department personnel respond to a fire and do everything they
reasonably can to put out the fire. Although they are usually successful,
occasionally the fire regenerates and they have to go back to put it out again.
If they followed procedures the first time, they are not held responsible for
the second fire. Further, if fire department personnel are notified of a
potential fire hazard and they take the normal steps to eliminate the hazard,
they are not held responsible if there is a subsequent fire at that location.
Having followed normal and accepted procedures is an adequate explanation for
how the event was handled.


A police department is notified of a domestic
violence incident. Officers respond, calm the situation, and arrest the
perpetrator. Suppose that this individual is later released from custody and
again assaults the same victim. Would it be reasonable to hold the police
department responsible for the second assault? No, it would not.


In the child protection arena, however, the
community imposes a far more exacting standard. Once the agency becomes aware
that a child is being abused or neglected or is, in the opinion of others, at
risk of being abused or neglected, that child’s ongoing safety and well-being
is viewed as the responsibility of the agency. Should the child be harmed, the
agency is, in most communities, held responsible if:


·      
The
agency is notified of suspected abuse or neglect but does not investigate.


·      
The
agency does investigate but does not provide remedial services.


·      
The
agency does provide remedial services but does not remove the child from the
parents.


·      
The
agency does remove the child but returns the child to the parents after
remedial services are provided.


·      
The
agency places the child with grandparents or other relatives.


·      
The
agency places the child in a foster or adoptive home or in another specialized
facility.


     What’s more, assigned responsibility
continues for an indefinite time after the agency has terminated its
involvement with the child and parents. It is a no exceptions, no excuses
standard. It is also a standard which most public child protection agencies
routinely accept, knowing that they cannot, by themselves, meet the standard.
Nonetheless, the narrow perspective discussed earlier is pervasive. The
persistent belief is that the agency is exclusively responsible for abused and
neglected children. The reality is that it is only one component of the
Children’s Safety Net. Unless all components of that safety net function
collaboratively, far too many children will not have their needs met, will not
have their problems resolved, will not be safe. The public child protection
agency cannot do the job by itself.





TOC Next Previous