“Don’t be afraid to take a big step
when one is indicated. You can’t cross a chasm in two small steps.” –
David Lloyd George
It sure sounds like good advice. One should not be too timid or
play it too safe. Sometimes you need to take a chance but notice that its
recommended only when its indicated. Therein lies the rub. How do you tell
when its indicated? Some days you get the bear and some days the bear gets
you; but you may want to double check to be sure the attack is imminent before
you pursue hand to paw combat with the bear. If you detect angry bear breath,
its likely indicated.
That clarifies the indicated part of the advice but what about
the Don’t be afraid part? Its not at all obvious why an absence of fear is
either important or required. Suggesting that one should or can confront lifes
angry bears without a good measure of fear and trepidation is absurd. Were
David Lloyd George here today to discuss the point, a line from Rudyard Kipling
would be apropos, You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din!
That leaves only the issue of not being able to cross a chasm in
two small steps. It sounds like one is being encouraged to leap and pray.
Thats like jumping off a cliff and hoping you can fly. Maybe this is good
advice but only if that angry bear is actually snapping at your heel. If not,
you might take time to build a bridge, consider climbing down the cliff and back
up the other side, or perhaps finding a trail around the chasm. Whether the
cost of staying where you are is worth the risk of falling in is also likely
worth a moment of careful contemplation. As Alexander Pope admonished, Fools
rush in where angels fear to tread.
The conclusion is that the advice embedded in the quote is pithy
but suspect. It implies that reluctance to take a big step reflects cowardice
and maybe even a serious lack of character. Neither is true. Georges advice is
certainly food for serious thought but should only be consumed with a large
grain of salt.